After recent discussions around negativity, critique, and confrontation I’ve thought long and hard about if it’s worth the time, effort, and no doubt aggravation this blog will create. But, after some careful consideration I’ve decided to go ahead to highlight some of the risks that can occur from voicing your opinions that maybe different and unpopular, and I also want show how some in our profession can be malicious, vindictive, and downright nasty about this.
As you may be aware, I produced some t-shirts a few months ago with some cheeky, some will say cheesy slogans that take the
piss mickey out of physiotherapy and express some of my opinions, including one that says ‘Manual Therapy SUCKS’. However, this slogan it appears was just too much for some of our ‘leaders’ and ‘presidents’ of our profession to bear, and so the proverbial shit hit the fan!
A few weeks after I launched this t-shirt an official complaint was sent to the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy by nine ‘senior’ physiotherapists, heads of special interest groups, presidents and leaders of our profession claiming that these t-shirts along with some of my blogs and social media posts were ‘damaging the reputation of the society and the profession’. They insisted that disciplinary action had to be taken against me and the t-shirts removed, however, they didn’t only stop there. They then went on and further accused me of sexism and bullying in an effort to discredit my personal and professional reputation.
After a couple of annoying and stressful weeks with me having to defend my opinions, views, and reputation against these ridiculous and vile accusations, I am pleased to say that an official CSP panel could not find any evidence to any of these accusations and none of the complaints were upheld.
As relieving as this is, I can assure you it was an unpleasant experience, which I’m sure is what these so-called ‘caring professionals’ wanted to some extent. However, I have no doubt that their real goal was for me to lose my licence as a physio and to be publicly discredited so that I would stop expressing my opinions on manual therapy which conflict with their own and threaten their own personal and professional interests.
This nasty, spiteful, and pathetic tactic of attacking a person’s character and not their argument is often used by those who want to divert attention away from things they wish not to be discussed anymore, or who just dislike the other individual. This is a classic logical fallacy called ad hominem and has been used on me many times before, but this was, without doubt, the most vicious, vindictive, and vile episode I have ever experienced.
I’ve been called all manner of offensive and derogatory things over the years, as well as being accused of having all sorts of ulterior motives for expressing my views and opinions. I’ve also had previous complaints, disciplinary’s, solicitors letters, even ‘open’ letters sent to me on social media. But, these have never bothered me as I know most are nothing more than pathetic expressions of angst, frustration, jealousy, or envy. I also accept that my strong views and opinions will attract strong views and opinions back, and I am also aware that I can have a direct and sometimes blunt way in conversing and discussing things, and yes, I am also aware that I swear a lot which I know offends some people!
But so fucking what!
Your offence at what I say, where I say it, and how I say it is just that, yours. Offence is more often than not taken rather than given. Simply put no one makes anyone listen to or read anything they don’t want to. We all have a choice at what annoys or upset us, take this blog for example, if it’s pissing you off… STOP READING IT.
Being offended at someone expressing their views, or their tone, or their language is essentially demonstrating that you are incapable of controlling your own emotions and expect others to do it for you. GROW UP.
However, this is not making excuses for, or defending some clearly obnoxious twats who deliberately go looking to offend others, these are clearly indefensible. But offence is on a continuum and many need to be more tolerant of different views, opinions, expressions and even language used.
Now I will admit I have made some mistakes in the past in how I have communicated online and face to face, and I have no doubt that I will continue to make more in the future. This is called being a human. But believe it or not, I learn from them and I try not to repeat them, but this doesn’t mean I will soften or change my views or opinions on topics I feel strongly about.
Many see the public online discussions, disagreements, and arguments that myself and a few others create as being harmful to our profession. They think that calling out nonsense, bull shit, or outdated practice is harsh and unproductive. Well, I think the exact opposite. I see ALL the discussions and disagreements as useful and signs of progress, even the flame wars which although can be a little tedious and pathetic at times, usually give me something to ponder. As Gandhi famously said ‘honest disagreement is a good sign of progress’.
Personally, I think by dragging the difficult topics and taboo issues out into the light from behind the closed forums and specialist echo chambers, and laying out different views and opinions for all to see, more will become aware, and more will feel confident to add their own views, and the more chance things have of changing and moving forward. As Jack Chew said on his recent podcast with me last month, when there are disagreements and difference of opinions the answer is always more discussion, not less.
As I am sure you know, I like to make my views and opinions clear on many things such as taping, injections, motor control exercises and often many disagree with them. This is great, and partly why I do it, and also why I occasionally take a stronger position to play devil’s advocate. I enjoy many of these debates and disagreements, however, I find I am enjoying the discussions around manual therapy less and less, mainly due to the maliciousness and nastiness of those who have vested interests in it and who just want to attack me rather than my argument.
Now just in case anyone is still unclear on what my position is on manual therapy I will lay it out one more time. I believe, based on current evidence, and my own clinical experience that ALL manual therapy used in musculoskeletal physiotherapy for pain is a very low-value intervention due to its non-specific, unreliable, short lasting, small effects.
In a nutshell, I think ‘Manual Therapy SUCKS!’ and should be abandoned by all musculoskeletal physiotherapists as it offers little for the effort and resources it consumes.
I do accept that manual therapy can reduce pain, a bit, in some, for a short while, but so can using heat, or ice, or going for a walk, and these are far cheaper and simpler to administer. When you compare manual therapy to other interventions for pain relief in many musculoskeletal conditions it’s hardly impressive, and this is why I believe that it has NO place in a public tax-funded health care system. It wastes resources, clogs up services, detracts time and attention away from the simpler higher value interventions. Of course there are many other interventions besides manual therapy that also waste resources and are low value, but lets just stick to manual therapy for now.
Many think my ‘hands off‘ position is too black and white, and that I am too harsh in my critique of manual therapy, after all, it’s a low-risk intervention with very little adverse effects when compared to things such as medications or surgery. Although this is true it still doesn’t mean manual therapy is worth using. Low risk, doesn’t mean worth using.
I do accept that manual therapy rarely causes any serious adverse events that medications and surgery can do (ref). But what many don’t understand or recognise are the other adverse issues manual therapy can cause. The first is that all pain relief treatments be that medications, injections, or manual therapy have the potential to, and do create reliance and dependency on them. Some patients can associate the temporary pain reducing effects that these interventions create as essential and necessary to continue, and this can lead to a loss of time, money, but more importantly self-efficacy.
I also don’t think many recognise the detrimental effects these low-value interventions have on our economy and healthcare services. As a clinician in a busy, overstretched, underfunded, NHS orthopaedic department I am constantly frustrated daily when I see and hear patients who could have been managed quickly and easily with some simple advice, guidance, and reassurance. But instead, they have been passed from pillar to post and forced to wait months due to departments and services clogged up with patients being rubbed, poked, clicked, pricked, taped or zapped for things that just don’t need it.
Finally, I don’t think many understand or recognise the detrimental effects these low-value interventions have on our society as a whole. The constant desire to reduce pain when it’s not necessary I believe is making our society less tolerant to pain, and many healthcare professionals are to blame for this, and this means YOU.
More clinicians need to understand that there is nothing uncaring, unprofessional, or unethical in advising patients to endure some pain from time to time. Many healthcare professionals need to understand that for most musculoskeletal conditions they often just need to confidently, respectfully, compassionately advise patients to carry on as normal.
However, do not think this is easy to do, this is hard, very hard and requires a clinician with skill, training and experience to do it well. The clinician needs to have an in-depth understanding of pain, pathology, and psychology, and this is why many do not do it. They are either unaware, unable, or unwilling to do this as it is often far easier to give the crappy explanations, do the shitty manual therapy, strap on the buzzy machines, or stick a needle into a patient to distract them rather than explain the complexity and uncertainty of pain and to carry on regardless.
Make no mistake, the physiotherapy profession is at an important crossroad in its history. It can either continue on the way it has offering low-value treatments to anything and everything putting us alongside the complimentary ‘professions’ on the fringes of healthcare with their energy crystals and chakra realignments. Or we can choose to abandon the low-value interventions and focus on doing the simple things better. Things such as giving good advice and education more effectively, encouraging physical activity and reducing sedentary behaviour better, and helping with other physical and psychological stressors that contribute to pain and poor health.
It is these views along with my concerns about the motives, ethics, and vested interests of many within the training and education ‘industry’ that has built up around manual therapy that make me question and challenge it so much. All postgraduate training in manual therapy
often always over complicates its application and over exaggerates the technical skill needed to apply it and the mechanisms of its effect, not to mention over promoting its use and overcharging for its courses.
However, this does not mean, nor have I suggested that manual therapy can never be used. I know that some health care professionals use manual therapy responsibly, wisely, judiciously and to good effect. But these clinicians are in the minority. In my experience many who use manual therapy use it inappropriately or at the expense of other more effective treatments. In my opinion manual therapy can be most useful outside of healthcare in other environments such as health spa’s, beauty salons, even in sports, although I see similar issues with its overuse and over exaggeration here as well. However, in my opinion it is in these environments where manual therapy belongs, as a luxury, an extra, some frills around the edges, some sprinkles on the top, a nicety rather than a necessity.
As a physio working in both public and private healthcare I now do not use ANY manual therapy. I used to, but over the years I have realised it’s just not needed to do my job well or effectively. And I don’t miss it, and neither do my patients. OK I do get some who ask me for a rub or a click now and then, but when I explain how it won’t help much in the short term and definitely won’t in the long term, and how it detracts away from what we need to be focusing on, most patients understand and continue to do an extra set of squats. But not all, some do go and get it elsewhere, and that’s ok, that’s their choice, and probably my failing for not explaining why they don’t need it better.
Now one final thing, just because I dont use manual therapy doesn’t mean I don’t touch my patients as I am often falsely accused. There is no argument from me that touch is powerful to those in pain and/or distress. Touch can and does calm, soothe, comfort, and assist both physically and psychologically, and I will occasionally use touch to guide, assist, or encourage a movement that a patient is scared, fearful, or lacking strength to do. Sometimes a few simple reassuring confident guiding touches during a painful movement is all thats needed to get a patient going forward. But this is not manual therapy per se, this is not joint cracking, pressing, or soft tissue rubbing, and there is no special technique or magic to it.
So if you’ve made it this far, well done. I will finish by saying some
senior physios scumbags are nasty, spiteful, vindictive people who will attempt to sabotage a persons reputation and career if their views and opinions are challenged and especially if their vested interests are threatened.
However, if they think they will deter or stop me they are mistaken. They can keep coming for me if they wish, but I am actually more determined than ever now to continue to call out their bull shit, and nonsense, and bad outdated practice, and continue to promote a more simple, honest, pragmatic way forward for physiotherapy. I will continue to push for a monumental shift in how all healthcare professionals manage people in pain, and I will continue to argue that we need to be more open and honest about what works and what doesn’t. Finally, I will continue to argue that we need to remove and abandon low-value interventions and adjuncts from healthcare including manual therapy, which quite frankly SUCKS… and these attacks are signs that manual therapy in healthcare is dying and these acts are the desperate death throes of those whose reputations and livelihoods are built on this shitty intervention!
Well, good riddance!
As always thanks for reading