It’s hip to be square… A guest blog by Benoy Mathew

So I am pleased to give you another guest blog by a friend of mine Benoy Matthew an MSK physio specialising in lower limb and running injuries. Ben has kindly reviewed the current 'en vogue' topic of the moment around the hip, that of Femoro Acetabular Impingement (FAI), the condition where deformation to the hip joint is thought to be a cause of many issues.

As with all new things, there is a buzz of papers, theories, and opinions on how it develops, how to diagnose it, and of course how to treat it. I have seen some dubious practices on this condition already, with surgeons doing pre-emptive operations on asymptomatic hips showing signs of FAI, to physios thinking they can spot it in nearly everyone and anyone with groin pain, and thinking they can fix it with manual therapy or bloody needles and sticky tape. So, with out further ado, its over to Ben to discuss if its hip to be square…

Understanding Femoro Acetabular Impingement:

Beyond CAMs and PINCERs

This September I attended the International Society of Hip Arthroscopy conference in Cambridge where leading hip surgeons, researchers, health economists and expert physiotherapists came together to discuss the latest developments and research findings in this rapidly evolving clinical speciality. I was fortunate to be there and gain up-to-date understanding on the management of Femoro Acetabular Impingement (FAI). This blog tries to answer, in the light of current evidence, the question of why only a small group of the population develop symptomatic FAI. I am thankful to Adam for giving me the opportunity to publish this blog on his website and share my clinical thoughts.

Background

Historically, most hip osteoarthritis (OA) was generally thought to be β€˜wear and tear’ or idiopathic in origin. For the last 15 years, there has been suggestion that development of idiopathic hip OA could be, partly, explained by structural abnormalities in the femur and acetabulum. One of the common morphological variations, Femoro Acetabular Impingement (FAI) has been increasingly recognised as a source of hip and groin pain in the active population. Over time, it has been hypothesised that these morphological variations can put stress on hip joint and could lead to degenerative changes in certain high-risk individuals

The prevalence of radiological FAI is a common finding in asymptomatic active individuals (ref). Three types of morphological variations have been described in FAI: Cam, Pincer and mixed. Fortunately, very few develop clinical symptoms and current evidence does not support prophalytic screening for FAI in the asymptomatic population (ref). A radiological finding of FAI is not sufficient for the diagnosis of FAI, since it is a clinical diagnosis, based on clinical history, physical examination and relevant imaging.

How do you define symptomatic FAI?

A recent consensus meeting defined FAI as “a clinical entity in which a pathological mechanical process cause hip pain when morphological abnormalities of the acetabulum and/or femur, combined with vigorous hip motion (especially at the extremes), lead to repetitive collisions that damage the soft-tissue structures within the joint itself.” (ref).

Let us examine some contributing factors which have been linked with the aetiology of FAI in the active population.

Genetic Factors

It has been reported that the relative risk of having a cam or pincer deformity in siblings of patients with cam or pincer type FAI is nearly three times (ref). Another study had shown that the morphological evidence of FAI was more common in white women as compared to Chinese women (ref). Further, the prevalence of cam deformity is higher in men compared with women (ref). These studies suggest there could be a genetic influence, leading to the development of FAI.

Developmental Factors

It has been shown that cam-type deformity develops around the age of 10-12 years (ref) and does not progress after the closure of the growth plate in the athletic population (ref). Therefore, one can assume that cam type deformity is related to skeletal development. Further, there is a link between training intensity and frequency with the radiological signs of FAI. Athletes with excessive participation in high-impact athletic activities such as football, ice hockey and basketball during adolescence when the skeleton is maturing have a higher incidence of FAI (ref, ref, ref). It is believed that the high shear forces at the antero-superior head-neck junction of the growing hip leads to changes in the shape of the growth plate.

Morphological Variations

Individuals with restricted hip internal rotation have a higher risk of developing hip pain (ref). The combination of a cam deformity along with restricted hip internal rotation can increase the likelihood of symptomatic FAI in the athletic population (ref). Decreased range of motion, especially hip internal rotation may subject the hip stabilisers to greater stress, leading to soft tissue damage (ref). Other morphological factors such as femoral anteversion, torsion and neck-shaft angles and variation in acetabular anatomy can also contribute to the appearance of clinically symptomatic impingement (ref).

Cumulative Overload

FAI is a motion-dependent process and is linked with the musculo-skeletal loading on the hip joint, which is directly related to the physical activities undertaken by the athlete. People who are involved in sports which involve vigorous hip motion (especially end-range flexion and internal rotation) are more likely to develop clinical FAI, in the presence of cam or pincer type morphology (ref). Athletes who trained four or more times per week had higher incidence of cam-type FAI than those who trained three or less times (ref). Sports such as football and ice-hockey that involve extreme ranges of hip motion and high impact movements have a higher incidence of FAI (17).

Conclusion

The mechanism leading to the clinical syndrome of FAI in certain individuals is not currently well understood. As a clinician, it is important to understand the multi-factorial nature of FAI (Figure 1), while evaluating an active patient with chronic hip related groin pain.

figure 1

At this point of time, there are no randomised controlled trials comparing conservative versus surgical management of FAI. Based on current evidence, it is hypothesised that radiological changes of FAI develop during adolescence due to repetitive and intense loading, especially during extreme range of motion (ref). However, the current evidence is not decisive and further high quality studies are needed to understand this complex condition.

I hope you found this short blog useful in understanding FAI and thanks for reading,

Ben

Ben is MSK Extended Scope Practitioner in the NHS and also in private practice. He has a special interest in lower limb, running injuries and chronic hip and groin conditions. He is passionate about application of research in clinical practice and is involved in regular teaching nationwide on multiple lower limb courses. You can follow ben on Twitter @function2fitnes

 

4 thoughts on “It’s hip to be square… A guest blog by Benoy Mathew

  1. Hi!

    This was a nice blog on the mechanical considerations regarding FAI.

    Do you have any thoughts on the psychosocial contributions?

    My fear is that this post might lead to people equating ‘end range sports activity + cam/pincer/mixed morphology + pain at the hip = clear cut mechanical pain that needs fixing” might not always be neither correct nor helpful.

    Clinically I believe we see a fair few athletes with this combination of pain, activity and radiology who might be highly vigilant and fearful of hip pain limiting their participation in sports. Portraying this problem discussing only load, morphology and mechanics is probably a little shallow, and I feel that ‘figure 1’ showing the multi factorial aspect of hip pain is lacking a few key components.

    I’d love to hear your thoughts on non-mechanical considerations.

    Cheers.

  2. Hi Ben,
    Interesting blog, thanks.
    My main thought is that, given “The mechanism leading to the clinical syndrome of FAI in certain individuals is not currently well understood. As a clinician, it is important to understand the multi-factorial nature of FAI….”, should we perhaps be calling it something different? Painful groin syndrome, for example? Perhaps the morphology is misleading, in the same way as has been found with the structure of the lumbar spine in low back pain?
    Thanks again,
    Pete

Please leave your comments here...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s