A Tiger’s Tale… or rather its Sacrum!

You may have seen over the last few days the news about how Tiger Woods sacrum ‘popped out’ during the Bridgestone Championships and how it was ‘popped’ back into place, and how this quick ‘fix’ had Tiger ready for the US PGA tournament five days later, only to see him grimace and wince his way around the first two rounds looking uncomfortable and off form and eventually not making the cut.

Now in a game like golf I’m well aware there are a myriad of other reasons why a golfer doesn’t make the cut, but to me it looked like Tigers back pain was a major factor.

So was Tigers sacrum to blame and was this miracle cure of ‘putting the bone back in’ that miraculous?

Well lets not sugar coat it, of course it bloody wasn’t.

The notion of anyone’s sacrum (a key bone in your pelvis) can just ‘pop out’ is complete and utter nonsense, let alone the sacrum of a fit athletic professional male golfer without any history of trauma, previous pelvic issues or any other risk factors such as joint hypermobility, to put it simply…


I’m not alone in thinking this is nonsense and pseudo science at its worse, many have voiced their concern and dismay at this debacle, including the British Journal Of Sports Medicine, who voice their concerns extremely eloquently here.

So lets look at why this ‘story’ of Tigers sacrum popping out has happened. But first lets look at why the sacrum simply can not pop out!

For starters the pelvis is an incredibly strong and stable structure with many, many strong ligaments and muscles across it. The sacroiliac joint does have some small amount of movement, no question about that, and yes some have more or less than others, but the variation is minimal and the belief that many have in thinking that they can 1) feel this joint move 2) decide if it’s in the right or wrong position and 3) adjust it with manipulations is just complete and utter tosh based in cloud cuckoo land and is nothing more than palpation pareidolia, a phenomenon I have discussed before in a previous blog here and on the assessment of the painful SIJ here and its management here.

Now that’s not to say the SIJ doesn’t cause some people pain, or more accurately can be a source of nociception which can produce pain, and yes there are pathologies and conditions that can cause this such as sacroiliitis etc.

But despite the common belief there is no evidence that instability or lack of it, or mal alignments cause issues around the SIJ, rather it is usually simply irritated due to overload.

So next question is why did Tiger think his sacrum had ‘popped out’ well there are two possible reasons

  1. He got the wrong end of the stick from his medical team
  2. He was given the wrong information from his medical team

So did Tiger get the wrong end of the stick? Did he misinterpret what his doctors told him?

Well its very possible! It is well known and documented that patients often misinterpret what medical professionals tell them. There are many stories of miscommunication and misunderstandings that unfortunately happen, like the one Kieran O’Sullivan talks about in this podcast about a patient who was concerned that her back pain was caused by some things called ‘vertebrae’ in her back after her doctor showed them to her on an xray!

Miscommunication like this does happen often, I had a patient who was convinced she had an extra bone in her shoulder after a doctor told her she had some calcification in her rotator cuff!

So yes its very possible Tiger got the wrong end of the stick. However, this is inexcusable in my opinion, that the medical team of one of the worlds most influential and recognised sports personalities do not FULLY brief and inform him about his condition simply, honestly and correctly, they will be well aware that he will be interviewed and asked questions about his injury and so must prepare him for such.

Now it may also be possible that Tiger didn’t get the wrong end of the stick and that maybe he was actually informed by his medical team that his sacrum had ‘popped out’! It seems that there are some doctors in the US that work with professional golfers that unbelievably think that this nonsense can happen.

For example a specialist golf MD called Dr Ara was seen discussing Tigers sacrum here on TV shortly after the incident and he seems to concur that the sacrum can dislocate and a quick 20 minute fix of popping it back in, together with some anti inflammatory’s equals ‘job done’.

He also goes on to offer some other rather dubious advice on hydration during the interview as well but that’s by the by!

Now when you look at Dr Ara’s website here we can see that he is a MD who has worked hard to rise to his current position as a golf specialist and this all sounds highly admirable, but the question still begs, why would a doctor who works with professional golfers choose to believe in some pseudo science such as dislocating sacrum’s?

Well in my opinion the answer is either pressure or ego!

The pressure can be from having to be seen to be doing something! Something proactive, something advanced or high tech or cutting edge by the player, or their management and even the public when really there isn’t anything more to do with a professional athlete than there is with any other patient in the early stages of injury. That is simply to give good, clear, sensible, well reasoned and evidenced based advice and education on the injury, recommend the most appropriate management, loading and if suitable, and maybe, just maybe a little bit of light manual therapy as well.

In my experience the best physios/doctors I know simply don’t offer or promise quick fixes or miraculous cures as they know they don’t exist!

I come across this a lot in professional sport, a desire by physios and medical professionals to promise things they simply cant do or that can be done just to be seen to be ‘doing’ something, whether its prolotherapy or PRP injections, horse placenta or stem cell massages, silly electrotherapy machines, manipulations, quacupuncture, stretchy tape etc etc the list can be endless, all in an effort to be seen as getting the athlete better, quicker, faster, sooner, I have a saying when I worked in professional football that I still use today….

the hardest thing for a physio or doctor to do at times is…. NOTHING!

Now, when I say ‘nothing’ I mean apart from giving good, honest, advice, education and optimal loading/movement stratagies for the essentail mechanotherapy effects, which really isn’t nothing, in fact it can be a bloody lot more hard work for a physio to do this, taking more gumption and guts to apply this than taking the easy pseudo scientific route and giving a muscle rub, joint pop or a bit of sticky tape!

Now, if it’s not pressure making medical professionals believe in pseudo science then its thier ego!

Ego to be seen as the smartest, cleverist or most cutting edge clinican! To be seen as being able to detect and cure things that other mere mortals cannot! Again I have seen this a lot, a hell of a lot in my time in both professional sport and day to day practice, guru’s, specialists or experts and thier influential charismatic personas who believe they have some extra skill or ability that no other in their field has, that only they can fix this athlete based on some mumbo jumbo clap trap that usually costs a lot of money!

Anyway, what now for Tiger? Well I wish him all the best for his recovery, but I do sincerely hope he hasn’t been affected by this episode of terrible, shockingly bad medical advice, and I hope he hasn’t been left with any negative thoughts or beliefs that his sacrum is now vulnerable to ‘popping out’ and that he doesn’t rely on the use of regular manipulations in a belief that it is putting it back in.

Instead I would suggest Tigers needs some simple, good, honest advice from a medical professional that his back pain isnt due to popping sacrums, that in fact its more than likley due to his recent disc surgey and the true cause of the structure to blame can really never be found, and that to manage this episode, it needs some time, regular movement and perhaps some good strength and conditioning from the many excellent golf specialist physios I know!

So Tiger if you need any recommendations, I know you’re a subscriber to ‘The Sports Physio’, drop me a line and I’ll hook you up with a sports physio who doesn’t feed you bull shit about sacrums popping out!

As always thanks for reading


95 thoughts on “A Tiger’s Tale… or rather its Sacrum!

  1. Thanks for the blog Adam. Evidence based and exactly the kind of information health professionals should be spreading. Unfortunately the messages given to some of the “SIJD” patients by their health care professionals is what has worsened their suffering. I don’t blame them for their beliefs as they’ve been fed the nonsense by someone that they have trusted with their health. There is just no need for the personal attacks on you. I’d like to know how many of them still suffer pain having seen these experts and how much ongoing treatment they require. I’d also like to add that a Wikipedia link does not constitute evidence and that a dozen EMGs can be wrong as it is not a valid tool to measure SIJ movement.

    • Hi Alan

      Thanks for your comments and you make a good point regarding those who have had their beliefs and understanding challenged which have be ingrained by either misinformed or unscrupulous so called health care professionals

      I do understand the cognitive dissonance effect can be unnerving and the reaction to lash out is strong, however I do not think that these comments are just due to this, instead each tried to direct/advertise a web page that ‘specialised’ in treatment if SIJD with them claiming a course of 6 injections is needed in succession and other dubious advice clearly looking to profit out of people in pain.

      Anyway thanks again for your comments



      • Yeah on second reading it looks like a lot of those comments are actually the same person – even with the advertising links removed. It’s a real shame that they play on people in pain to make their living and would go to the lengths of hijacking a page that is trying to educate the patient and therapist without financial motive. Thanks again.

  2. Adam, from your responses, you seem to be targeting a certain type of practitioner that sells “snake-oil” cures for real situations that really should be treated by professionals, and for that I thank you. I think the place where you’re making enemies, albeit unintentionally, is with the flippancy (as someone else pointed out) of your response to the seriousness of SIJD. Most of us have seen well over 20 doctors (most of whom seem to want to fuse our spines interesting enough) who have been dismissive about the role of movement in chronic pain generating from the S/I joint.

    Yes we are angry. However, I agree with you about the unfortunate use of phrases like “popping out” (what?) of the S/I, or “bones grinding together”… it certainly doesn’t do anything to further the cause! What we would like to see is more professionals who take this condition seriously so that we can get treatment (other than fusion) that’s covered by insurance. That doesn’t seem like too much to ask. This is a real condition, and many of us network with our PTs and Physiatrists to try to advance the public discussion about SIJD. We’re simply looking for allies rather than critics. Sorry if you take our anger personally, but this is a life-changing condition that simply isn’t accepted within the traditional medical community.

    • Hi Ross

      Thank you again for your comments

      However I am sorry but I dont agree nor can I see where I have been, or can be accused of being flippant ANYWHERE in ANY of my blogs or replies about anyone in pain or suffering with SIJD and I will not accept that critisim as its just untrue. I have NEVER said SIJD 1) doesn’t exist 2) doesn’t cause pain 3) doesn’t cause distress or 4) shouldnt be taken seriously

      I do understand and am well aware that those with ‘true’ SIJD can be frustrated and upset but that is no excuse for attacking me personally as they have mis-read my blogs or are just poorly informed and not willing to listen to an evidenced based view that doesnt invole injections, manaipulations or things poppin in or out!

      I am, and will continue to try and raise awareness of the nonsense and garbage that surrounds this painful and chronic condition, and will always try and educate clinicans (snake oil merchants and others alike) as well as patients that the notion of the SIJ popping in/out is harmful, incorrect and misleading, most manipulations, injections and surgery is unproven, poorly evidenced and has no guarantee of anything other than costing a lot of money, time and aggravation for the patient.

      I also want to point out again to all SIJD sufferers that there are many more patients who are told that they have SIJD who just dont have SIJD, more than I’m afraid those who have SIJD who are missed or passed around, these are the one who should be getting angry, frustrated and upset at the misdirected treatments and months of ineffective manipulations by these snake oil merchants and sometimes by well meaning clinicans when their SIJs are not the source of their back pain

      Again as I keep saying I dont dispute SIJD causes pain for some, I dont dispute that the pain is disruptive, stressful and limiting, but I do dispute that I am flippant, ill informed or any of the other accusations I have been accused of surrounding this condition, if anything its just the opposite.



      • I’d actually love to find a significant number of patients that are being misdiagnosed with SIJD as you are stating. Actually getting an SI hypermobility diagnosis is extremely challenging in all of North America. As the posts above mentioned it takes many doctors (osteopaths, physiatrists, lower back multidisciplinary pain clinics, several pt’s, diagnostic injections etc). I do not understand how you can imply that too many people are receiving incorrect information and diagnosis when we can’t find people to offer the proper diagnosis for the SI joint in the first place!

        I’ve went through several lower back pain programs only to stretch my SI ligaments even further due to hypermobility of the SI joint. My Si joint was jammed in an anterior and uphiked position, and did not have proper alignment & bracing like an SI belt which set me up for failure. It left me completely bedridden unable to move basically any part of my trunk without extreme pain for over six months. Ross said patients just want acknowledgement that sacrum alignment is important and yes the joint only moves a few degrees, but add in a few extra degrees and the sacrum can become a life altering, extremely expensive injury if not handled correctly. To recover usually requires some sort of manipulation of the sacrum and/or iliums along with an extensive physio therapy program for a significantly long time. Maintaining SI joint alignment is a huge component to recovery.

        You tell us patients to educate ourselves, but you remove the posted links that have scientific studies by specialists, not for profit organizations with links to articles, and even specialized pelvic rehabilitative clinics. None of them were advertising or being provided to make a profit in any shape or form. Now others reading these comments cannot make an informed decision for themselves whether this joint needs adjustment, manipulation, mobilization or not as you clearly truly believe. The person can’t determine if the stabbing pain in the SI joints, piriformus syndrome, sciatic impingement, thigh pain, incontinence, bowel problems, pubic symphysis pain, groin pain, thigh pain, pelvic floor pain, inability to sit or walk is due to sacrum nutation as you removed the links. It was not advertising these sites, but providing information for others to make informed decisions since you do not appear to want to investigate the posted concerns further.

        Instead as patients posting, we were judged, told that we are not listening to an evidence based view and even ridiculed as these conversations are humorous to other followers of your blog. Glad you are sitting there laughing at us as we are fighting to get our lives back and stop living in excruciatingly debilitating pain. It’s sad that some therapists are so narrow minded about the SI joint. I think it’s truly due to lack of education on how complex the pelvis truly is but a good therapist would take the time to research the information that has been provided to them. I wish you could see the passion and effort that was put into those responses. I know I do. Lastly, when you post a blog, you must be open to criticism and hopefully take replies to heart and see if you can grow as a therapist from them. I personally feel your responses to these posts will turn new patients off.

        Here are the links again if you so choose to leave them this time.
        Not for profit foundation: (link removed as this site contains unevidenced treatment options and claims a series of treatments are needed with no evidence)
        Educational Pelvic Therapist: (link removed again due to unevidenced and harmful information)
        Journal of Prolotherapy SI Study:
        The primary author noted that the patient had a positive pain or “jump sign”39 when palpating the ligaments around the lumbar spine and pelvis. It was determined through a thorough history that the patient reported symptoms consistent with unstable sacroiliac joints. These symptoms included a sacrum that was rotated to the right and was painful with palpation. Functionally the patient could perform pain-free biking, exercise without the lumbar “catching” sensation and was able to return to work without having his SI joint move out of place. The patient could also perform activities of daily life such as yard work, without pain and stiffness which had been present prior to the Prolotherapy sessions. Besides the improvement in function, there was a reduction in hip popping, SI irritation and lumbar spine pain. The popping, pain and loss of function all improved over the course of the treatment. The combination of very specific ligamentous Prolotherapy treatments with the inclusion of manual therapy and exercise resulted in a successful outcome for this patient with pelvic pain and CLBP. – See more at: http://www.journalofprolotherapy.com/index.php/prolotherapy-for-pelvic-ligament-pain-a-case-report/#sthash.vdwcfKRt.dpuf

        • Dear Carmen

          Thank you for a calmer more reasoned comment this time without any personal attacks, I am more than happy to discuss my blog rationally and sensibly and I do accept critisim if back by a reasoned well balanced arguement and some evidence, but I will NOT tolerate un called for vitriol as in your last post

          I understand that you are in pain and distress and that your emotions maybe high, but that is still NO excuse to attack without reading things thoroughly and accepting other professionals opinions when back by well documented evidence

          I am also now confused as to if you are a sufferer of SIJD or a therapist who manages SIJD, you seem to be both in your comments

          I’m afraid I have again removed the links to those web pages you keep posting as I have visited the sites and I’m afriad I do not agree with some of their explinations, advice nor the treatment approaches they use, for example insisting that ALL those with SIJD have 6 PRP or prolotherapy injections along side manipulation is not evidenced and incorrect.

          Just because you cannot find or have NOT seen or come across patients that have been mis-diagnosed with SIJD doesn’t mean they don’t exsist, you will have to accept my clinical experience here, I have seen many patients who have been told they have SIJD and been treated as such or told that their SIJ is unstable only that when I do the best evidenced pain provocation tests as described by Laslett as as mentioned in my other SIJ blog here https://thesportsphysio.wordpress.com/2013/04/14/whats-the-best-way-to-reliably-assess-the-sacroiliac-joint/ they have no pain so ruling out the SIJ as an issue, and so are frustrated that they have had endless manipulations costing £1000’s for no reason

          Also as I meantioned NO-ONE is laughing at you, it is the attacks in the comments towards me that are uncalled for that are causing others some amusment, more at my expense than yours I can assure you.

          Thank you for the paper you posted I will read it later and critically reivew its method and results and see if it has anything to add to my understanding of SIJD

          Finally one last time…




  3. Wow…. long time reader. Kind of disgusted in how you responded to some “SIJ fans.” Derogatory. I don’t know what a “popping out” sacrum feels like, but I do know my sister suffered from this for 4 years after having her second child and it was, in fact, debilitating and saying your sacrum “pops out” is just Tiger’s easy way to appease the media and explain an injury in simple, “dumbed down” terms as we all know, it’s extremely complicated!

    Let this injury happen to you.

    You suffer from it for months or years and come back and write about the fact that it “does NOT move.”


    • Wow, thank you for you comments and misguided, and ill informed personal attack, fits in nice with all the others recently

      If you care to re read the comments and the blog, I think you will find no derogatory comments from myself, just the opposite, many from others towards me, should I just accept ad hom attacks, aggression and mis direct vitriol that is clearly uncalled for?

      PS the SIJ doesn’t not pop out… I will keep saying it, and again thats not saying it doesn’t hurt and yes there is massive issues with Tiger Wood’s a very public figure incorrectly saying this which is seen by millions of people with back aches thinking that their sacrums can pop out, either due to a lack of understanding or miscomminucation by his medical team or that his medical team actually did give him this ridiculous, incorrect and harmful diagnosis with absoultely no evidence nor justification, hence my blog to raise awareness that SIJs dont pop in or out, and once more just incase that doesnt mean they DONT hurt…

      • Oh my goodness. As I said in my post, saying it “popped out” was an easy way to describe what was going on to the media. The SIJ moves only about 3 degrees!! A tiny movement or dysfunction can FEEL like it’s “out of place.” You’re right. It doesn’t pop out, per say. But it can get stuck within it’s own grooves if the ligaments aren’t supporting the joint correctly. But that little bit of movement is exactly what he was referring to after his injury. You’re entire post mocking the clearly exaggerated statement of Tiger is what annoyed the hell out of people.

        Meh last time I’ll respond to this. Not worth it. Wish you the best in helping your patients, truly. Sorry you’ve felt attacked.

        • This may sound harsh Melissa but after the couple of days I’ve had with yours an the many other unprecedented, uncalled for and unwelcomed personal, malicious ad hom attacks due my blog being posted on some misguided SIJ self help group on facebook, your veiled, cloaked, faux and phoney apology is neither well received nor wanted!

          And for the FINAL AND LAST TIME there is NO mocking in my posts or replies, dismissive of balnoey and pseudo science, yes, mocking of patients in pain, absoultley NOT

          Its also interesting that you seem to have gone from the SIJ moving too much to now moving too little as your excuse/explanation of pain, how about instead you consider that perhaps its not the movement of the SIJ that causes the pain at all in persistent cases but rather central nervous system changes

          But as you rather eloquently say… MEH!

    • Exactly Melissa! Easy way to describe a very complex problem. Hopefully Tiger’s doesn’t do it again!

      • oh for the love off… please please please Carmen, Melissa and all the others understand that the SIJ just does NOT pop in/out in a fit healthy athletic male golfer with no history or past medical history of SIJ related issues, its irresponsible for Tigers medical team to either have advised him as such or allowed him to incorrectly think as much

        That is all

  4. There is certainly a lot of learning to be done by physiotherapists, chiropractors and doctors on the topic of SI Dysfunction. I have been struggling with the condition for over 4 years now, and it was caused by a manipulation by a physio. He informed me that my pelvis was “locked” and this was causing my upper body pain in my arms and shoulders. He said I needed a manipulation of my SI joint, which I had never heard of. My only reason for the visit was the arm and shoulder pain. He was persuasive and so I allowed the manipulation, which subsequently turned my life into a living hell! The right SI joint became hyper mobile and I could not walk and suffered excruciating pain! And of course there was no help to be found at Emergency where they just send you home with pain killers. Doctors were no help. I had to do my own research to figure out what I had. This condition is no laughing matter, it is severely disabling, and that is why sufferers are angry when you speak so flippantly about it. The sacrum does shift and get stuck in painful positions, there is no doubt about it. Or in the case of hyper mobility the SI joint is not holding together and walking mechanics are totally dysfunctional. And the fact that a physiotherapist did this to me is unforgivable. I find the medical community is in the Dark Ages, they are so uninformed about this and people are not getting the help they need . LOTS of people!

    • Hi Fran

      I’m sorry to hear you are in pain, but I will again state that, I am not, nor have I EVER been flippant about anyone in pain, I am flippant, annoyed, short etc etc at the ill educated unreasoned and poorly informed nonsense that surrounds those with SIJD and the beliefs that the SIJ can pop in/out promoted by some therapists and their profit driven need/desire to offer everyone injections and manipulations

      On the subject of manipulation I am sorry to hear that you had a traumatic experience with one, this is just the reason I dont use them in my daily practice, however although this manipulation obviously caused you pain, I think it is highly unlikey in fact impossible that a manipulation can cause a SIJ to become hypermobile.

      The forces needed to stretch the incredibly strong ligaments and fascia around your SIJ to the point of laxity have been measured to be in the 1000’s of newtons well beyond the 100’s of newtons that has been measured in therapists performing manual therapy.

      So although it sounds like you expereinced some poor management and practice by this physio, you havent been made hypermobile by the treatment recieved

      I hope this helps, and I hope you find a good physio who can offer you some well balanced reasoned and sensible advice and guidance on how to progress with your pain.



  5. Thank you again Adam and the other readers who have taken the time to reply for for highlighting some very key issues in the management of musculoskeletal issues, in this case the SIJ.

    It is clear that there are some very strong belief systems surrounding this topic and it is clear that these are miles apart amongst the readers of this page.

    Firstly, I feel I have to make it clear that I have every sympathy with anyone that who has pain. I have had both low back pain and pelvic pain (during both my pregnancies) so can speak from personal experience with empathy.

    Secondly, I also have every sympathy with patients looking for a solution to their pain and find that there is an array of different HCPs offering very different explanations for their pain, which is confusing and I am sure disheartening. I can understand the anger that brews up inside when someone questions their current line of management as it holds an aspect of hope of an end to their problem and hope is a very important factor in any rehab programme.

    The issues raised highlight that there are very different paradigms that HCPs work under. Some work under a biomedical bias where structure is blamed as the source of the pain (such as the SIJ clinic that has been discussed by some of the readers here) while others work under a biopsychosocial model that incorporates an understanding of the multidimensional nature of pain science when considering the pain source. This is the paradigm that Adam and myself and many HCPs work under. The majority of those that work under a biopsychosocial approach now (if not all) were trained under the biomedical model and found that it did not hold the answers to the majority of their patient needs, hence over time, they have found another model to work under. For me, it was a gradual process over the 18 years since I qualified.

    This model is fundamentally different from the biomedical one as it gives the key to controlling the pain (in this case) to the patient compared rather than the person who is delivering the treatment. While passive modalities (such as manual therapy, manipulation or even injections) may be used in this approach (this is what we mean by remembering the “bio”), the focus is more on exploring the reasons why someone has pain beyond the structure (in line with pain neuroscience literature) such as the points I describe in an earlier post in the blog. Treatment choices are then given to the patient to target the many different factors that lead to pain. If this way of thinking about pain is new to you, then this clip may be helpful

    Adam has been highlighting these issues within his blog for a long time and, while they are highly highly challenging to those who are stuck in another belief system, they do reflect the current state of evidence that is out there. It is important that both sides of this argument is heard. By all means question your current or future HCP’s reasoning as to why they are using the treatment strategies that they are, even ask for proof that the evidence they are using comes from peer reviewed, evidence based journals.

    So, where to go from here for the readers that have so passionately argued the case for the specialist SIJ clinic?

    If it is working for you, great. (And what I mean by “working”that is that you are back to achieving your full function without the need for regular expensive treatment strategies that only appear short lived).

    If not, then I hope this discussion begins to sow the seed of doubt that maybe there is an alternative way of thinking about this condition that gives the keys of control back to the patient and enables a return to function.

    If there is even a seed of doubt, I would suggest readers take a look at this evidence based you tube clip that underpins a lot of the reasoning that I have discussed:

    And please, let’s keep any future comments positive and non derogatory on all levels. Otherwise, pertinent issues get lost in emotion.

    Best wishes


  6. Helen,

    I think many well-educated SIJD patients like myself are aligned with you that there is definitely a physiological component to successful pain management. Maybe a layman’s way to explaining it is that HCP’s need to treat the whole patient, rather than simply identifying and treating the source of pain. However, that second video that you provided is exactly the type of dismissive BS that many of us have been fighting against. Some, like myself, for decades.

    Trust me, I am no malingerer. The source of my SIJD is a damaged sacrotuberous ligament. My left S/I is definitely mobile. It definitely responds to manipulation. An injection of lidocaine into the joint provides 100% relief (until it wears off of course). My condition is not “in my head” or related to stress in any way. Yet, I have had to work my way through over 20 HCPs until I found one who provided the right mix of manipulation, PT, “Prolotherapy” (yes, it really works for me), pain medication, and general support, to allow me to keep working and not become bedridden. You have no idea how many doctors have told me that “it’s all in my head” or insinuating that I’m just trying to score narcotics.

    I completely understand that there is no cure for my condition. I have met with the chief surgeons at both Georgetown and Johns Hopkins who have advised me to “try everything” before I resort to fusion, to include Prolotherapy, and that’s the attitude that keeps me moving forward. I’m not stuck in a belief system. I’m fighting a medical establishment that refuses to acknowledge S/I mobility as a possible diagnosis for my pain and nerve symptoms.

  7. Wow, again. I don’t think I have ever replied twice to an AdamMeakins blog. It is kind of sad and hilarious all at once. In no particular order, I think a lot of the angry replies are from people who don’t yet understand pain science,as people should understand, pain is an output, not an input from the periphery. Second, what is a diagnosis of SIJ pain? Just because it hurts there?? I don’t get that. Following on from that if you have a “diagnosis” of SIJ, why is it so hard to fix then if we “know” what is wrong. Thirdly, from some of the respondents who claim a one off manoeuvre of their SIJ ruined their lives, well that is a can of worms. Firstly, pain is pain, if you have it, experience it, well you do. But rationally you have to look a bit deeper in those circumstances. The human body is a very strong structure that moves and twists ,lifts etc everyday. How would a controlled biomechanical stretch ruin someone? (assuming it wasn’t an aggressive manipulation).
    Finally, I think we need to call bullshit when we see it in manual therapy. We may never get rid of it ,but we must reduce it.

  8. A round table discussion came out with the following;
    The SIJ does not pop in/out
    There is very very minimal movement in the SIJ
    There is SIJD, quite rare but there are antagonistic tests
    A fit and healthy individual would not normally suffer from SIJD, no previous history etc
    ‘…….. strengthening program’ that’s the way forward
    Referencing wikipedia! Peer reviewed?
    A year of treatment of any sort should be reviewed as to if this is the right treatment
    Read the article for what it is and not what you want it to say/not say

  9. It is sad to see that there is still such a huge divide between pain science and the biomedical model. It is even more upsetting to have real pioneers of pain science like Peter o’sullivan misunderstood completely. He did not imply that patients with pelvic girdle pain are malingerers, there was genuine concern in his voice about individuals being misinformed by health professionals. His research along with a number of respected researchers (Butler, Moseley, Flor and many others) have shown the strong effect the nervous system has in protecting ourselves when we suffer with long term pain. Chronic pain is not simple it is extremely complex which is exactly the reason why when an individual suffers from long term pain (whatever the body part) we want answers. I wish that treating chronic pain with an injection and a manipulation was that simple but it really is not. Pain is a multi sensory experience influenced by a multitude of factors that is ultimately controlled by the brain. It is a subconscious system that looks to protect us from harm. It becomes a self perpetuating cycle like any feedback mechanism that the brain controls subconsciously. Our body systems adapt to stimuli and learnt behaviours. I.e your muscles becoming stronger with gradual increase in load.
    It’s an adaptation of our nervous system that becomes better and better at being able to recognise what can be a driver of an individual’s pain. In this case pelvic girdle pain.
    I realise this is completely off topic (tigers sacrum popping out) but it seems that there is an underlying cause to some of the comments being made here. Adam I am disappointed that some comments have missed the point of your blog completely and that you have been chastised. It does highlight that in some rare cases that the biomedical model is still as strong as ever.

  10. It is sad to see that there is still such a divide between pain science and tissue based pain. It is also a shame to see that Peter O’Sullivan is so misunderstood. If you actually listen to his blog there was no suggestion of malingering. There was genuine concern in his voice regarding individuals suffering from pelvic girdle pain.

    Pain is not simple you cannot use something like touching the area that is painful as a predictor of outcome, this is an extremely naive and somewhat damaging approach. Pain is extremely complex influenced by a multitude of factors. Pain does not exist in your tissues. It is not your tissue telling you you are in pain, your brain does this. Just like your ears don’t tell you you are listening to your favourite song on the radio. Your brain does this. Your nervous system “put simply” is the delivery system. Your senses exist all round your body and it is your nervous system (like any other system) with training that gets better and better and being able to recognise the stimuli it is subjected too. This has nothing to do with the premise of it all being in your head, except for the fact that your brain is in your head……

    It is a shame that there are individuals still out there being misinformed and still holding onto a strong desire to want people/HCPs to understand their story of the suffering they went through. There is so much strong evidence out there by researchers that are paving the way to understanding the complexities of pain (Butler, Moseley, Flor and many more) and have have shown that what you experience in terms of pain is not equal to the level of tissue damage you suspect their to be. Chronic pain is complex and debilitating hence why something like chronic SIJ pain (and any other body part) can be so frustrating and the desire to seek treatment is so strong. However having injections and multiple manipulations is not an effective way to continue to manage your symptoms due to some of the long term side effects that these forms of therapy can have.

    I realise that this is getting off topic (which was medical professionals rightly or wrongly using incorrect terminology to describe what potentially happened to Tiger’s Sacrum) but it clearly also created a strong message from Adam about his beliefs and evidence based understanding of the SIJ. It also created a strong response with some clear comments about how angry and let down some individuals are by the healthcare system, however this is not a reason to chastise one healthcare professional over another.

    I only hope that we have more discussions like this in order to educate individuals that have commented so strongly about their experiences with chronic pain (SIJ pain) in the hope that pain science can be better understood.


  11. Well, congrats adam on the blog and all the responses…. Its good to see the emotional reactions too…. People caring for loved ones…. (Attacks a little less, but hey we all do this once in a while…

    A few tips on the SIJ… It can be a problem (in a mechanical or tissue based way) in 3 ways:
    -rheumatologic conditions
    -after childbirth
    – post trauma (car crashes, falling of a roof etc etc)

    So then we need to consider the SIJ as a direct cause of pain…. (But it still does not pop in or out of place, by all means i do not state there is no mobility in the joint, it would not be called a joint otherwise)

    But then again in these conditions we need to think movement, loading or deloading tissues, graded exposure, reassuring the patient they will be fine etc etc

    In chronic SIJ pain ( no dysfunction) … The pain is felt in this region, but that does NOT mean there is something WRONG with the joint… In persistant pain there is more to adress than just the region where the pain is felt (emotional state, thoughts about pain, fear, avoidance etc ect… The list goes on….

    Wanted just to most a short comment, no reason to personally attack adam, he’s a nice guy with the best intentions for the physio bussiness….

  12. Here is a list of the specializations I have consulted in my two year search for a diagnosis of the injury I suffered two years ago when I found myself in immediate severe pain after lumbar traction by the same, highly experienced physiotherapist who provided me with a copy of “Pain 101” which is a condensed patient version of the theory the Naked physio has provided above: 4 highly experienced and renowned physiotherapists (worldwide) – I’d be happy to provide their names, 2 physiatrists, 2 pain management physicians, 5 orthopedic surgeons, 2 neurosurgeons, 1 neurologist, 1 psychologist, 1 prolotherapy physician. There are probably more. The unanimous diagnosis is sacroiliac joint dysfunction due to ligament injury with secondary piriformis syndrome. What interests me the most about this conversation is that the professional physiotherapists here are quite adamant that a patient with sacroiliac pain must have a condition which is “all in their head” due to a hypersensitized central nervous system and that CBT and exercise is all those lazy, crazy loafers need to recover. The professional physiotherapists here can say this without exception and without ever having laid eyes on any one individual patient in question. Doesn’t that make you think? Personally I believe this must point out some fundamental flaw in the education physiotherapists are getting, in general. And also comments that individuals commenting must be professionals, not patients because they have educated themselves on the condition which they have. Also the assumption that those here arguing that in fact sijd and sacroiliac ligament injuries certainly do exist, know nothing of the theory of pain and are not educated enough themselves to understand what component of their injury or condition can be attributed to mind-body syndrome. Open your minds Physiotherapists! And do your research! As an educated, si joint injured patient, I’ve done my homework. I will take the diagnosis and treatment advice of the international team of healthcare providers I have cobbled together. If it’s all in the patients head, how do you explain the approximately 20,000 sacroiliac fusion surgeries done worldwide with a success rate around 75 percent? Sacroiliac and pelvic injuries are complex and there is no one size fits all. That makes it challenging and seemingly perplexing for the majority of physiotherapists. There are experts world-wide, such as Diane Lee in Vancouver, Canada and others in the US and Europe who offer courses for PTs should you wish to expand your knowledge!

    Note to Adam: are you sure those Youtube videos posted above meet your criteria? You may wish to remove those links.

    • Patti

      You are talking rather flippantly and disrespectfully about some very highly experienced therapists with extended skills and knowledge of dealing with patients suffering persistent pain just like yours, not some wet behind the ears just out of grad school kids, you should listen and perhaps consider their approach which is based on sound science and evidenced based reasoning, not quick fixes, surgery or costly injections

      Also please understand that when some one is saying someone has a centralised state of persistent pain it is not saying its “all in their head”

      Neurological changes have occurred due to pain being persistent, this changes in the way the nervous system works and processes information that makes us feel pain, its not just ‘in your head’ mumbo jumbo, its neuroscience, and I urge you to do some more research and reading that you obviously have already done on this, not just around the structure or those who fix structure, such as surgeons or Diane Lee

      By the way I went on Diane Lee’s SIJ course a good few years ago, whose name you keep mentioning, and i’m afraid to say that her teachings and her opinions (she has no evidence) about the SIJ (and thoracic rings as she has moved on from pelvises) isn’t upto date with current thinking, the evidence base or even plausibility and ALL of her reasoning is based in structure with little consideration for the neural system as a cuase or source of pain and dysfunction, but she does have a slick marketing campaign and web site

      Once more I will please implore you to go and read around persistent pain, the neuromatrix and other areas of advanced thinking rather than just the structure, to get you started please read this paper by Ronald Melzack http://dspace.ceu.es/bitstream/10637/2431/1/articulo.pdf it will help you

      If you have any questions about it then please just ask

      I do wish you well


      • Even with the Diane Lee material being controversial, her latest material advocates just one “gap” manip for the SIJ and she has quietly thrown a myriad of biomechanical techniques out the window in the past two decade. The research may well influence that cull even more (hopefully).
        The rings are another matter…

  13. As Physiotherapists you have completed a degree which is simply a foundation by which you can further expand your knowledge through clinical, hands on experience and through post graduate learning, which all physiotherapists should undertake continuously as healthcare providers. A Physiotherapist degree does NOT make you all knowing – you are not doctors, you do not have all the answers. Admit it. The pelvis is complex and no two injuries or conditions are the same. The sacroiliac joint is THE major weight bearing complex in the body transferring weight and force to the lower extremities. As such it is 1) almost impossible to immobilize and 2) ligaments have low blood flow making them prone to slow and imperfect healing or non healing. How you can attempt to ascribe one theory of pain to such a complex area and all patients where no two injuries are the same and to an area which has confounded physiotherapists, physicians, scientists for decades – now that’s hilarious. You must be quite a brilliant lot of people.

    • Ok Patti

      Enough is enough, these misdirected and un called for personal attacks to people who are trying to help you must stop

      If you don’t want help then move on, have your injections manipulations and surgery and I wish you well, but any more childish nonsense to some well respected and extremely well educated health care professionals and I will simply block you and you can go on your merry way

      Oh and please remember that the great Diane Lee you keep referring too is only a Physio not a doctor, yet you seem to take her opinion, why is that?

    • patti,

      I do not know what kind of experience you have had previously with Physiotherapists, and no disrespect to doctors, but yes, we are the specialists when it comes to movement based disorders. A doctor who simply palpates then miraculously diagnoses a “tendinitis” followed by a cortisone shot (and trust me, I hear this story multiple times a week).
      If we go back to the root of this debate, Tiger Woods’ amazingly hypermobile sacrum. Numerous studies have shown that women may have about 10 degrees of nutation and counternutation (we can call it movement if you’d like) while men have practically zero and present like a fused bone. Either way, please have some respect for physiotherapist and our body of knowledge, some of us abuse and the title and make knuckle-headed statements but those on this blog are pure class and evidence-based comments.
      Enjoy your other alternative treatments in the future.

  14. Patti,
    You are correct, a Physiotherapist degree does NOT make you all knowing (although I’m confident Adam never said it did!), physiotherapists are not doctors, true, they don’t have all the answers but neither do doctors.
    Yes, the pelvis is complex (isn’t the whole body?) and certainly, as you say, no two injuries or conditions are the same. Actually, let’s just say no two people are the same….remember we are dealing with people here, who, like you, happen to have a painful problem and a very active nervous system.
    Sincerely, I am very sorry to hear of your suffering and I’m sure you needed a diagnosis; however, it seems to me, labelling your pain problem a ‘dysfunction’ or a ‘syndrome’ is a cop-out.
    Without moving into another commentary on pain science….there are many excellent blogs reviewing that information….I would just like to ask you Patti, how does an SI joint signal pain? How does it become ‘dysfunctional’ despite being such a tough “weight bearing structure” and what is ‘pyriformis syndrome’ when a syndrome is a collection of symptoms (poor pyriformis, why does a single muscle get so much blame despite the fact that muscles can’t actually signal anything, only nervous tissue)?
    As a well-informed health professional (albeit lacking the courtesy title of Doctor), with access to exactly the same research and information as physicians, physiatrists and neurologists, I have to agree with Adam and others who have commented positively in response to this blog post.
    Yes, there are occasionally very painful issues associated to the SI joint but unfortunately, as with many other painful conditions, medical professionals often contribute to the development of a problem through POOR DIAGNOSIS AND CLINICAL REASONING, often leading to inappropriate (failed) interventions and the resulting problem of persistent pain.
    I wish you luck in finding a solution, be wary of self-proclaimed ‘experts’, they may not be expert critical thinkers.

  15. Hi Adam,

    Thanks for another successful blog post. Its always interesting to see great divide between schools of thought such as SIJ pain. Simply put, the thought of something moving out of place or not being aligned needs to go. It not only misinforms the patient, but instills fear-avoidance behaviors, and makes them more dependent on health care practitioners to “fix” them. There is lots of evidence to suggest decreased self-efficacy/coping skills leads to greater disability and more reliance on health care. There is always something that the patient, like Tiger, should know what to do (i.e lumbar AROM ex’s) in case of a flare-up. This should be provided by his medical staff a some point…? Moral of the story, it is unfortunate that a large community is still reinforcing the idea that things are out of place 😦

    Based on the anatomy (thick ligaments, form/forced closure), many excellent papers from Laslett et al, and clinical experience, I feel confident that true SIJ pain is most likely not the culprit for posterior lumbo-pelvic pain when there is no history of direct trauma. There is no doubt that the SIJ can get ‘grumpy’ or ‘angry’ like any joint/tissue, but low back pain often the culprit.

    In Tiger’s case, we know there is history of low back pain, along with a recent back surgery (not SIJ fusion). Additionally, like many injuries, there can be future episodes of low back pain, likely due to some irritated muscles or nerves. To settle this down, a manipulation may due to the trick, and if Tiger was better informed, he would have stated that the technique helped relax/reset the muscles similar to hitting “control, alt, delete” on your computer. This thought puts a better picture in our mind and is more informed. However, the thought that the sacrum broke free from its anatomy, displacing, and falling onto nerve, and then pushed back into place with a manipulation is simply untrue.

    In order to form a proper discussion we need to accept the evidence along with expert opinion and maybe add some anecdotes. Unfortunately for SIJ subluxation, a key piece is missing, the evidence. I am sure there are several anecdotes that may feel like the SIJ “came out” and were somehow reassured that it did, but frankly, it probably did not. Of course you can never say “never”, but with the knowledge we have today, Tiger Woods and the other 80-90% of earth inhabitants, we are likely experiencing low back pain.

    Great Blog,


    • Hi Sean

      Thanks for your comments thoughts and insight, its much appreciated, and its good to see many others aware of the issues and errors around the ‘old school’ biomedical approach



  16. It shouldn’t come as a big surprise that patients who are convinced that the pain they experience in the SIJ region (or any body part) is driven by a discrete mechanical dysfunction, only manage to find any relief from a treatment they are convinced can ameliorate said dysfunction. And it shouldnt be surprising that following any resolution of pain from such treatment, patients will emotionally and defensively defend said treatment until the cows come home. This is not the patients’ fault. Its an indictment on the (at best) incomplete or (at worst) erroneous explanatory narratives such patients have received from various practitioners, who themselves peddle treatment methods that lack a defensible theoretical framework that considers and accounts for variables that we know influence a persistent pain state. Any resolution of pain that follows treatment that claims to realign/stabilize/mobilize/put back in the SIJ should not necessarily be assumed to be entirely the result of reduced nociception secondary to manually (or surgically) driven mechanical changes to structures within the SIJ. Of course there are structures within and around the SIJ that can be strained to the point that nociceptive pathways are activated… but to assume that that nociception is the primary driver of any long term persistent pain problem of the pelvic regions is to ignore what is known about the neurophysiology of pain.

    Consider the following example. man trips and falls onto the point of his knee. SIJ has to contend with significant shearing force in A-P, inf-sup direction. Lets assume no other structures in the body are strained (for the purpose of this example). Man present to physio with all the signs of an “upslip”. Physio explains that the force of the crash probably strained the ligaments around the SIJ, but in all likelihood, the joint itself is not “out of place”. Its more likely that
    – the nociception from the strained tissues set up defensive motor output to the muscles around the pelvis and hip
    – the strained tissue released some chemicals that trigger an inflammatory response
    – inflammatory chemicals excite the nociceptors in the area
    – the defensive motor output, sustains strain on tissues, perpetutating a nociceptive drive
    – the defensive motor output can sustain the SIJ in a fixed position
    – the nociceptive drive excites other neurons in the dorsal horn, thus amplifying nociceptive signaling to the CNS
    – your cognitions, understanding, fears, anxiety of affect the “meaning that is attached to this nociceptive input, which influences the extent to which it is felt as pain.

    It is most likely that following a week or so of NSAIDs to help with the inflammatory drivers, and some rest to allow the strained tissues to heal, we will be able to start to apply treatment that will help to reverse all of these defensive mechanisms (defensive motor output, peripheral and central sensitization). These defensive mechanisms are normal… we just dont need them to hang around any longer than is necessary. Long term pelvic pain problems tend to be more about the persistence of these defensive mechanisms even though the problem itself (the strained SIJ joint/ligaments have healed). The ongoing defensive motor output that persists in the form of a positive feedback loop with the sensitization of nociceptive pathways, is likely the driver of any observed asymmetries in joint motion/position at the SIJ. The treatment that will help your body to shift out of “protection mode” doesn’t have to be directed at the SIJ itself, although it may help. The key is to understand that your pain and stiffness is the first step towards its resolution. Treatment that desensitizes your nociceptive pathways, and reduces defensive motor output, will allow your SIJ, and the rest of your body to move normally again. For some people it takes only days or weeks to get back to normal, for others it can be months. There shouldnt be need for surgery (although there could a need where there is large trauma/force involved), and the treatment approaches that are hyperfocused on doing something mechanically and directly and manually to the SIJ are superfluous to the extent that those doing them ignore, or are ignorant of the extent to which other elements of the clinical interaction might be driving any observed outcomes.

    The message is simple for patients… your pelvic pain is not a manifestation of structural defect/dysfunction… it is at least in part a manifestation of defensive neurophysiological processing. Its up to your physio to guess at the relative proportions of “defense”vs “defect” for your individual SIJ pain problem.

    if your physio has not heard of any of the stuff I’ve just written about, or is in the habit of leaning more towards “defect” than “defense” with regards to diagnosis, i think you should find a new physio.

    • Hi Bisco

      Thanks for your comments and thoughts

      I totally agree that no blame, ridicule or shame should be now or ever assigned to any patient for having erroneous structural beleifs about their persistant pain, this fault lies squarely with the out of date, mis informed or unscrupulous clinicans that propergate these incorrect beleifs.

      It is instead as you allude to our responsiblity to educate and inform patients of the ‘other side’ and try and promote awareness of the science behind persistant pain that isnt based on quick fixs, invasive treatments or expensive regular visits to therapists.

      However when patients refuse to listen or even acknowledge and then turn against the clinican then so be it… as they saying goes, you can only lead a horse to water!

      Maybe our approach, or rather my approach to patient education on this subject could do with improving, which is something I am going to look into after this debacle.

      Thanks again for your insights


  17. As always, another excellent blog exploring the myths surrounding so many issues experienced by patients. The comments sections always make for interesting reading – really provides an insight into the beliefs of patients regarding pain, especially in such an emotive area as the spine. Undoubtedly many people around the globe have had persistent problems with back/hip pain, pain which perhaps is made worse with harmful behaviours/cognitions reinforced by clinicians who themselves rely on outdated or poorly evidenced scientific theory to explain and treat it.
    In my own clinical experience, albeit fairly limited thus far, a large proportion of patients who present with lower back or sij type symptoms describe their own issues along the lines of ‘popped out’ or ‘misaligned’. As we know, this simply cannot happen from a structural point of view due to strong compressive force of the ligaments and muscular structures in these areas. Not without significant trauma or underlying systemic disease at any rate.
    I wonder if these beliefs will continue to persist within society, and for how long. Surely as our profession places a greater emphasis on scientific understanding and validity, we will start to see this being eroded from a patients vocabulary? I suppose however that people seek help and advice from a range of clinicians (not solely physio but chiro, osteopaths, sports therapists etc whose education or working practices I can’t comment on) , who may or may not continue to propagate this type of language.
    This article, and the comments section, really underlines the importance of the educational aspect of our job – to educate patients in how the body can be injured, and how pain works even at a basic level will hopefully sow the seeds initially for a more successful outcome further down the line, not just for that patient but everyone who they will subsequently talk to about their experiences.

    As always, great reading and some thought provoking moments. I always come away from your blog feeling that I have learned something new so thanks for that Adam!

  18. It is nauseating to hear you all congratulating each other. This is all an intellectual exercise for you. You had an opportunity here to learn from people who are experiencing the condition, but you are too set in YOUR beliefs to learn something new. The founder of the SIJD foundation in the U.S. was a college athlete who was injured doing a swimming flip turn. She struggled for many years and finally had a screw fixation surgery that gave her her life back. Now she is trying to get the word out to patients who are looking for answers and to clinicians who don’t understand the condition. What it will take for you to understand this is for you or a loved one to have this happen. That will completely change your perspective. Then you can go through the experience of having so-called professionals tell you your injury is IMPOSSIBLE.

    • Hi Fran,

      Having just read the SIJD foundation information page, I have a few comments to make on it.

      1) The information is fairly well written with even some research (of various quality) to reference it. However nowhere in the information does it mention that the joint can ‘pop out’ or ‘slip’, which is what many people commenting have been saying is highly unlikely in the absence of major trauma, so I am not sure what you refer to as being impossible. True SIJD is rare, but can of course be a debilitating and painful experience, which is what has been highlighted again and again throughout

      2) The information isn’t up to date and makes no mention of what has been well researched in recent years with regard to pain science. Much of the information seems to be focused on a biomedical model of injury, which was discussed in some detail in an earlier post and is viewed by many health professionals as a rather old fashioned and outmoded approach. We know that pain, especially chronic spinal pain, is influenced by so much more than simply a structure in the body being ‘at fault’.

      I can only apologise if you feel that the people reading and commenting on this article are arrogantly ignoring people’s experiences of pain. Speaking for myself, I have read and commented on this post with a genuine desire to learn more, in order to better help other people. This includes reading/evaluating the latest scientific research, and anecdotal evidence from clinicians AND patients (see my previous post).

      It is a sad fact that within healthcare there exists professionals who unfortuantely aren’t aware of information and treatment approaches that are well supported with strong scientific evidence. Not everybody is perfect and I’m sure nobody here would claim to be an expert in this field (what even is an expert?), but from what i’ve read, many comments certainly ring true with what is currently being taught in universities throughout the UK, as well as by leading academics or therapists working in clinical practice. It is important to note that this teaching is supported by EVIDENCE which is of a high scientific standard, rather than an individual therapists theories which may be largely anecdotal.

      If it is yourself or someone you know that has a chronic pain problem, then I hope that they are able to access a health care professional who can offer sound scientific advice, and deliver a treatment programme which is effective, long lasting, and doesn’t result in a hefty bill at the end.

      Kind regards,

  19. Bisco, I don’t disagree with anything you’ve said. In some cases this is correct. In others the evidence is starting to build, that if you remove the joint hyper-mobility, the lower extremities muscle dysfunction, imbalance and neuromuscular problems cease to exist.

    Based on my personal experience, for me having a diagnosis of sijd and secondary Piriformis syndrome (hip rotators problem) is important as it rules out the lumbar spine as the primary pain generator and directs the physiotherapy regimen which is quite different than the physiotherapy regimen of a disc or facet patient. Trial and error, three years of constant research and consultation with every expert in the field tells me this. Dr. Stuart McGill is another expert worth investigating.

    In regard to Tiger Woods:

    – level of fitness is not a good indicator of who is at risk to develop sij problems. I know a military special forces trainee who became disabled by sijd.

    – Tiger Woods has a profession in which he is continuously doing the same repetitive motion. This puts him at risk.

    In regard to the psycho-social aspects of chronic pain, a great book that all patients should read before considering surgery is entitled “Back in Control”.

Comments are closed.